Gov Con's Eric Prostejovsky talks to Julie Green, former program director for Nevada State Child Support and current member of the Maximus Program Modernization Consulting team, Premjeet Kisun, former senior consultant for California State Federal Healthcare Reform Impact, and Ann Knefel, former program manager for Loudon County (Virginia) Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Developmental Services.
How successful modernization journeys help avoid the modernization graveyard
Former program leaders share their stories.
The graveyard
ERIC: There’s a graveyard of failed government programs across the U.S. As former state program directors, why do these projects fail?
JULIE: In my state, they took me out of my office and put me over a $120 million project with really no experience in running a system implementation project. I was making decisions that I probably had no business making, but I had to make them. And I really had to make big girl decisions that nobody else wanted to make. Everybody was willing to let me make it because they could point to me if it went wrong.
PREMJEET: States know what they need. They know their pain points adn what they're trying to fix. But it's making sure that requirement is documented in a way that it can be coded. Sometimes IT will come in and they’ll build what they think it means. And a lot of times there's a difference in that understanding.
ANN: Between the tech and the program side, you're speaking two different languages. You've got program staff who are based in helping the children, focusing on their programs and delivering these. They’re not in the tech world. So that in itself becomes really challenging for program staff and also tech staff to work on modernization projects.
Bridging the divide
ERIC: So how do you begin bridging those gaps between the two worlds of program and IT?
JULIE: If you look at these large scale implementations as an IT project you’re going to fail because they’re so heavy on the functional requirements. If you don’t get the IT side on board, then you're constantly fighting a battle. And I think that’s where a lot of states fail in making them part of that organizational change management. Your IT staff is terrified because they've been working on a system that was developed in the late nineties, early 2000, and now they’re moving to something that’s a little bit foreign to them.
ANN: Another one of the things that’s critical, in any project is the ability to be flexible and to adjust because the landscape changes on a project. People come, people go. You may think you have all the resources, you may think you have the budget and stuff happens. When we first did our first scope of work with this particular client, they initially wanted to start work on some cross integration and data quality strategy. And it became very apparent that we needed to shelve that and pull up some of the other priorities, which is to work through their business requirements and modify that so that they could then produce their RFQ and then hire their vendor. You have to change courses to meet those needs.
Meeting program needs
ERIC: How do you go about that? How do you make sure the program gets what it needs?
PREMJEET: I actually played a role in a state where I was the functional manager, so I would have my Joint Application Development sessions with the technical and the business staff. We would talk through all the different questions and answers. And then at night when everybody left, the technical team and I would stay back for about 2 to 3 hours, and we would whiteboard technically what that meant and how they would build it. And then the next morning when we met with the state for the recap, I would translate that back to the state, this is how it looks to the end user on the page and just trying to bridge that gap.
JULIE: Also, having a trusted advisor is so imortant. Being thrown into the deep end, every day you feel like I have no business being here. Having an advisor that’s been through a modernization to say, "This is how I would advise you, but follow your instincts. If you need me to run coverage, I’ll run coverage.”
PREMJEET: A trusted advisor, someone who’s walked in my shoes, maybe not a mile, but someone who’s actually walked in my shoes. Someone that understands not only the technology but the program. And they know there's very significant impacts that our programs will have on the lives of the communities that they serve.
This interview was conducted by GovCon Different.